The most important question when we refer to the California Lemon Law is whether the vehicle or the product in question is qualified as a "lemon." The details to be considered when judging whether a vehicle or consumer product is a lemon are the warranty period, the type of flaws and the number of repair attempts. Another important query is on the number of attempts the manufacturer needs to make before the vehicle can be called a "lemon", as stipulated in the California Lemon Law.
Opinions of the dealers and manufacturers regarding the warranty have made it even more confusing by spreading wrong information on the Internet. The new amended California Lemon law regarding the time and mileage of the vehicle clearly states 18,000 miles or eighteen months (which occurs earlier).
Another important question is whether all consumer products qualify under the California Lemon Law. The other query is whether the arbitration program will completely satisfy the owner and if the refund will be equal to the amount that the court decides.
The California Lemon Law also defines the term "attempt" because even taking the vehicle to the dealer or manufacturer for repairs is also termed as an attempt, although the dealer did not perform any changes or repairs on the vehicle or the product.
Another frequent query is about vehicles or consumer products bought "as-is". This indicates that the consumer knew the inherent flaws in the product and still invested in the vehicle or product. The "caveat emptor" or "buyer beware" law states that any product that has a defect about which the buyer is warned before the purchase, cannot qualify for the California Lemon Law.
The California Lemon Law Questions also answers the questions regarding the refund of expenses for the cost of repairing a vehicle is in no way negligible.